Seestar S30 vs DWARF mini: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
ZWO Seestar S30 against DwarfLab DWARF mini, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the DWARF mini is 1.1× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the DWARF mini is 1.1× faster.
Field of view. Both frame 2.1° or so on the long side, so they suit the same targets.
Detail. Pixel scales are within 10% of each other, so neither has a real detail advantage.
Subs and dark skies. The DWARF mini goes up to 90 s subs in EQ mode, the Seestar S30 tops out at 60 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. Both carry a dual-band filter, which is what makes emission nebulae practical from a lit sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Seestar S30 | DWARF mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Focal length | 150 mm (f/5.0) | 150 mm (f/5.0) |
| Sensor | Sony IMX662, 2.1 MP | Sony IMX662, 2.1 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 2.9 µm |
| Pixel scale | 3.99″/px | 3.99″/px |
| Field of view | 2.13° × 1.20° | 2.13° × 1.20° |
| Sub exposures | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s | 15 s, 30 s, 60 s, 90 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (LP filter) | Built in (Dual-band) |
| “No filter” position | UV/IR-cut | Astro |
| Read noise used | 1.2 e⁻ | 1.2 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | Seestar S30 | DWARF mini | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 32 min552 subs | 1 h 27 min349 subs | DWARF mini 1.1× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 14 min84 subs | 12 min50 subs | DWARF mini 1.1× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 39 min597 subs | 1 h 24 min336 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 4 h 51 min1,748 subs | 4 h 35 min1,102 subs | DWARF mini 1.1× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 7 min45 subs | 8 min30 subs | Same |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 48 min651 subs | 1 h 31 min366 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min46 subs | 8 min30 subs | Same |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 50 min1,022 subs | 2 h 41 min645 subs | DWARF mini 1.1× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | Seestar S30 | DWARF mini | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 38 min231 subs | 34 min135 subs | DWARF mini 1.1× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 11 min67 subs | 9 min38 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 14 min442 subs | 58 min233 subs | DWARF mini 1.3× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 55 min689 subs | 1 h 39 min396 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 6 min39 subs | 8 min30 subs | Seestar S30 1.2× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 20 min481 subs | 1 h 03 min253 subs | DWARF mini 1.3× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 5 min30 subs | 8 min30 subs | Seestar S30 1.5× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h 09 min412 subs | 1 h239 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
Try the Seestar S30 in the calculator Try the DWARF mini
About the ZWO Seestar S30
Wider and lighter than the S50 with the same 2.9 µm pixels, so its per-pixel speed on extended targets is close despite the smaller aperture. Ideal for big nebulae.
About the DwarfLab DWARF mini
DwarfLab’s answer to the Seestar S30: same sensor and focal length, big pixels, dual-band filter built in, and 90 s subs in EQ mode. Sensitivity over megapixels.
Other comparisons
Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S30 vs Seestar S30 Pro
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 vs Draco
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S30 vs Vespera II
- Seestar S30 vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S30 vs Vespera 3
- Seestar S30 vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S30 vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S30 vs Odyssey
- Seestar S30 vs Origin
- Seestar S30 vs Origin Mark II
DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF mini
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF mini
- DWARF mini vs Draco
- DWARF mini vs DWARF II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF mini vs Vespera 3
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF mini vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF mini vs Odyssey
- DWARF mini vs Origin
- DWARF mini vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · Seestar S30 page · DWARF mini page