DWARF mini vs eQuinox 2: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
DwarfLab DWARF mini against Unistellar eQuinox 2, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the DWARF mini is 1.1× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the DWARF mini is 1.1× faster.
Field of view. The DWARF mini shows 2.13° × 1.20° against 0.76° × 0.57°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the eQuinox 2 needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. The eQuinox 2 samples at 1.33″ per pixel against 3.99″, so it pulls finer structure from small targets: planetary nebulae, globular cores, galaxy arms.
Subs and dark skies. The DWARF mini goes up to 90 s subs in EQ mode, the eQuinox 2 tops out at 4 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The DWARF mini has a dual-band filter built in; the eQuinox 2 does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | DWARF mini | eQuinox 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 30 mm | 114 mm |
| Focal length | 150 mm (f/5.0) | 450 mm (f/3.9) |
| Sensor | Sony IMX662, 2.1 MP | IMX347-class, 2.9 µm (Unistellar does not name it), 3.2 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 2.9 µm |
| Pixel scale | 3.99″/px | 1.33″/px |
| Field of view | 2.13° × 1.20° | 0.76° × 0.57° |
| Sub exposures | 15 s, 30 s, 60 s, 90 s | 4 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (Dual-band) | None |
| “No filter” position | Astro | No filter |
| Read noise used | 1.2 e⁻ | 1.8 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | DWARF mini | eQuinox 2 | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 27 min349 subs | 1 h 19 min1,191 subs | eQuinox 2 1.1× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 12 min50 subs | 15 min224 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 24 min336 subs | 2 h 04 min1,854 subs | DWARF mini 1.5× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 4 h 35 min1,102 subs | 4 h 14 min3,814 subs | eQuinox 2 1.1× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min30 subs | 6 min96 subs | eQuinox 2 1.2× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 31 min366 subs | 2 h 15 min2,028 subs | DWARF mini 1.5× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min30 subs | 6 min94 subs | eQuinox 2 1.2× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 41 min645 subs | 2 h 28 min2,219 subs | eQuinox 2 1.1× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | DWARF mini | eQuinox 2 | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 34 min135 subs | 46 min690 subs | DWARF mini 1.4× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 9 min38 subs | 9 min137 subs | Same |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 58 min233 subs | 1 h 11 min1,064 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 39 min396 subs | 2 h 24 min2,164 subs | DWARF mini 1.5× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min30 subs | 4 min66 subs | eQuinox 2 1.7× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 03 min253 subs | 1 h 17 min1,162 subs | DWARF mini 1.2× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min30 subs | 4 min60 subs | eQuinox 2 1.9× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h239 subs | 1 h 25 min1,270 subs | DWARF mini 1.4× |
Try the DWARF mini in the calculator Try the eQuinox 2
About the DwarfLab DWARF mini
DwarfLab’s answer to the Seestar S30: same sensor and focal length, big pixels, dual-band filter built in, and 90 s subs in EQ mode. Sensitivity over megapixels.
About the Unistellar eQuinox 2
A 114 mm Newtonian with five times the light grasp of a 50 mm refractor. Fixed 4 s subs put it in read-noise territory under dark skies, but the aperture carries it. The published field is 45.6′ × 34.2′, a crop of the sensor.
Other comparisons
DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF mini
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF mini
- DWARF mini vs Draco
- DWARF mini vs DWARF II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF mini vs Vespera 3
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF mini vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF mini vs Odyssey
- DWARF mini vs Origin
- DWARF mini vs Origin Mark II
eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S30 vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S30 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF 3 vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF mini vs eQuinox 2
- Draco vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF II vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera II vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera 3 vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera Pro 2 vs eQuinox 2
- eQuinox 2 vs Odyssey
- eQuinox 2 vs Origin
- eQuinox 2 vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · DWARF mini page · eQuinox 2 page