DWARF mini vs Odyssey: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
DwarfLab DWARF mini against Unistellar Odyssey, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the DWARF mini is 5× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the DWARF mini is 6× faster.
Field of view. The DWARF mini shows 2.13° × 1.20° against 0.75° × 0.56°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the Odyssey needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. The Odyssey samples at 0.93″ per pixel against 3.99″, so it pulls finer structure from small targets: planetary nebulae, globular cores, galaxy arms.
Subs and dark skies. The DWARF mini goes up to 90 s subs in EQ mode, the Odyssey tops out at 4 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The DWARF mini has a dual-band filter built in; the Odyssey does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | DWARF mini | Odyssey |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 30 mm | 85 mm |
| Focal length | 150 mm (f/5.0) | 320 mm (f/3.8) |
| Sensor | Sony IMX662, 2.1 MP | IMX415-class, 1.45 µm (Unistellar does not name it), 6.2 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 1.45 µm |
| Pixel scale | 3.99″/px | 0.93″/px |
| Field of view | 2.13° × 1.20° | 0.75° × 0.56° |
| Sub exposures | 15 s, 30 s, 60 s, 90 s | 4 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (Dual-band) | None |
| “No filter” position | Astro | No filter |
| Read noise used | 1.2 e⁻ | 1.2 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | DWARF mini | Odyssey | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 27 min349 subs | 6 h 07 min5,505 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 12 min50 subs | 1 h 08 min1,016 subs | DWARF mini 6× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 24 min336 subs | 9 h 33 min8,594 subs | DWARF mini 7× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 4 h 35 min1,102 subs | 20 h17,741 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min30 subs | 28 min422 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 31 min366 subs | 10 h9,406 subs | DWARF mini 7× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min30 subs | 28 min419 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 41 min645 subs | 11 h10,297 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | DWARF mini | Odyssey | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 34 min135 subs | 4 h 05 min3,683 subs | DWARF mini 7× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 9 min38 subs | 47 min701 subs | DWARF mini 5× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 58 min233 subs | 6 h 21 min5,721 subs | DWARF mini 7× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 39 min396 subs | 13 h11,739 subs | DWARF mini 8× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min30 subs | 21 min309 subs | DWARF mini 2.7× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 03 min253 subs | 6 h 57 min6,257 subs | DWARF mini 7× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min30 subs | 20 min297 subs | DWARF mini 2.6× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h239 subs | 7 h 36 min6,843 subs | DWARF mini 8× |
Try the DWARF mini in the calculator Try the Odyssey
About the DwarfLab DWARF mini
DwarfLab’s answer to the Seestar S30: same sensor and focal length, big pixels, dual-band filter built in, and 90 s subs in EQ mode. Sensitivity over megapixels.
About the Unistellar Odyssey
Unistellar’s compact 85 mm with autofocus and tiny pixels. Sharp, but the fine sampling costs time on faint extended targets. The Odyssey Pro is the same telescope with an eyepiece added, so these figures apply to both.
Other comparisons
DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF mini
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF mini
- DWARF mini vs Draco
- DWARF mini vs DWARF II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF mini vs Vespera 3
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF mini vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF mini vs Odyssey
- DWARF mini vs Origin
- DWARF mini vs Origin Mark II
Odyssey
- Seestar S50 vs Odyssey
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Odyssey
- Seestar S30 vs Odyssey
- Seestar S30 Pro vs Odyssey
- DWARF 3 vs Odyssey
- DWARF mini vs Odyssey
- Draco vs Odyssey
- DWARF II vs Odyssey
- Vespera II vs Odyssey
- Vespera Pro vs Odyssey
- Vespera 3 vs Odyssey
- Vespera Pro 2 vs Odyssey
- eQuinox 2 vs Odyssey
- Odyssey vs Origin
- Odyssey vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · DWARF mini page · Odyssey page