DWARF mini vs DWARF II: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
DwarfLab DWARF mini against DwarfLab DWARF II, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the DWARF mini is 4× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the DWARF mini is 4× faster.
Field of view. The DWARF II shows 3.19° × 1.79° against 2.13° × 1.20°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the DWARF mini needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. The DWARF II samples at 2.99″ per pixel against 3.99″, so it pulls finer structure from small targets: planetary nebulae, globular cores, galaxy arms.
Subs and dark skies. The DWARF mini goes up to 90 s subs in EQ mode, the DWARF II tops out at 15 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The DWARF mini has a dual-band filter built in; the DWARF II does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | DWARF mini | DWARF II |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 30 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal length | 150 mm (f/5.0) | 100 mm (f/4.2) |
| Sensor | Sony IMX662, 2.1 MP | Sony IMX415, 8.3 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 1.45 µm |
| Pixel scale | 3.99″/px | 2.99″/px |
| Field of view | 2.13° × 1.20° | 3.19° × 1.79° |
| Sub exposures | 15 s, 30 s, 60 s, 90 s | 15 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (Dual-band) | None |
| “No filter” position | Astro | Astro |
| Read noise used | 1.2 e⁻ | 1.2 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | DWARF mini | DWARF II | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 27 min349 subs | 4 h 59 min1,198 subs | DWARF mini 3× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 12 min50 subs | 57 min228 subs | DWARF mini 5× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 24 min336 subs | 7 h 45 min1,860 subs | DWARF mini 6× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 4 h 35 min1,102 subs | 16 h3,817 subs | DWARF mini 3× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min30 subs | 25 min101 subs | DWARF mini 3× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 31 min366 subs | 8 h 29 min2,035 subs | DWARF mini 6× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min30 subs | 24 min97 subs | DWARF mini 3× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 41 min645 subs | 9 h 16 min2,225 subs | DWARF mini 3× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | DWARF mini | DWARF II | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 34 min135 subs | 2 h 31 min603 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 9 min38 subs | 31 min126 subs | DWARF mini 3× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 58 min233 subs | 3 h 50 min922 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 39 min396 subs | 7 h 44 min1,856 subs | DWARF mini 5× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min30 subs | 16 min64 subs | DWARF mini 2.1× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 03 min253 subs | 4 h 11 min1,006 subs | DWARF mini 4× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min30 subs | 14 min57 subs | DWARF mini 1.9× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h239 subs | 4 h 34 min1,097 subs | DWARF mini 5× |
Try the DWARF mini in the calculator Try the DWARF II
About the DwarfLab DWARF mini
DwarfLab’s answer to the Seestar S30: same sensor and focal length, big pixels, dual-band filter built in, and 90 s subs in EQ mode. Sensitivity over megapixels.
About the DwarfLab DWARF II
The original pocket scope. 24 mm aperture and tiny 1.45 µm pixels mean it is slow per pixel, so bin or downsample and be patient.
Other comparisons
DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF mini
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF mini
- DWARF mini vs Draco
- DWARF mini vs DWARF II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera II
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF mini vs Vespera 3
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF mini vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF mini vs Odyssey
- DWARF mini vs Origin
- DWARF mini vs Origin Mark II
DWARF II
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF II
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF II
- DWARF mini vs DWARF II
- Draco vs DWARF II
- DWARF II vs Vespera II
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF II vs Vespera 3
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF II vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF II vs Odyssey
- DWARF II vs Origin
- DWARF II vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · DWARF mini page · DWARF II page