Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
ZWO Seestar S50 Pro against Vaonis Vespera Pro 2, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the Seestar S50 Pro is 2.4× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the Seestar S50 Pro is 1.8× faster.
Field of view. The Seestar S50 Pro shows 2.45° × 1.38° against 1.65° × 1.65°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the Vespera Pro 2 needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. The Vespera Pro 2 samples at 1.68″ per pixel against 2.30″, so it pulls finer structure from small targets: planetary nebulae, globular cores, galaxy arms.
Subs and dark skies. The Seestar S50 Pro goes up to 60 s subs in EQ mode, the Vespera Pro 2 tops out at 30 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The Seestar S50 Pro has a dual-band filter built in; the Vespera Pro 2 does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Seestar S50 Pro | Vespera Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal length | 260 mm (f/5.2) | 245 mm (f/4.9) |
| Sensor | OmniVision OS08B10 (1/1.2″), 8.3 MP | Sony IMX676, 12.5 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 2 µm |
| Pixel scale | 2.30″/px | 1.68″/px |
| Field of view | 2.45° × 1.38° | 1.65° × 1.65° |
| Sub exposures | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (LP filter) | Clip-on option (Dual Band filter) |
| “No filter” position | UV/IR-cut | No filter |
| Read noise used | 1 e⁻ | 0.8 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | Vespera Pro 2 | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 36 min575 subs | 3 h 07 min1,121 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.0× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 14 min83 subs | 36 min217 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.6× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 36 min574 subs | 4 h 49 min1,736 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 5 h 03 min1,817 subs | 9 h 52 min3,552 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.0× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min46 subs | 16 min99 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.2× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 44 min625 subs | 5 h 16 min1,898 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min48 subs | 15 min93 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.9× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 57 min1,063 subs | 5 h 46 min2,075 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.0× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | Vespera Pro 2 | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 38 min227 subs | 1 h 19 min472 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.1× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 11 min65 subs | 17 min105 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.6× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 08 min407 subs | 1 h 59 min713 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.8× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 52 min672 subs | 3 h 56 min1,414 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.1× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 7 min40 subs | 10 min59 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.5× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 13 min441 subs | 2 h 09 min776 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.8× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 5 min30 subs | 8 min50 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.6× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h 07 min404 subs | 2 h 21 min845 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.1× |
Try the Seestar S50 Pro in the calculator Try the Vespera Pro 2
About the ZWO Seestar S50 Pro
The S50 optics at 260 mm on an 8 MP 1/1.2-inch sensor: a wider, taller field, four times the pixels, and 60 s subs in EQ mode. Per pixel it is a whisker slower than the S50 because of the longer focal length; the long subs make it the better dark-site scope.
About the Vaonis Vespera Pro 2
The square-sensor 2026 Vespera with 2 µm pixels. Sharper than the Vespera 3 on small targets and correspondingly slower per pixel; the 12.5 MP square frame suits galaxies and planetaries.
Other comparisons
Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Draco
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Odyssey
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin Mark II
Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S30 vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S30 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF 3 vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro 2
- Draco vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro 2
- Vespera II vs Vespera Pro 2
- Vespera Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Vespera 3 vs Vespera Pro 2
- Vespera Pro 2 vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera Pro 2 vs Odyssey
- Vespera Pro 2 vs Origin
- Vespera Pro 2 vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · Seestar S50 Pro page · Vespera Pro 2 page