Seestar S50 vs Seestar S50 Pro: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
ZWO Seestar S50 against ZWO Seestar S50 Pro, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the Seestar S50 is 1.1× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the Seestar S50 is 1.1× faster.
Field of view. The Seestar S50 Pro shows 2.45° × 1.38° against 1.28° × 0.72°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the Seestar S50 needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. Pixel scales are within 10% of each other, so neither has a real detail advantage.
Subs and dark skies. Both top out at 60 s subs, so neither has an edge at read-noise-limited dark sites.
Filters. Both carry a dual-band filter, which is what makes emission nebulae practical from a lit sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Seestar S50 | Seestar S50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal length | 250 mm (f/5.0) | 260 mm (f/5.2) |
| Sensor | Sony IMX462, 2.1 MP | OmniVision OS08B10 (1/1.2″), 8.3 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 2.9 µm |
| Pixel scale | 2.39″/px | 2.30″/px |
| Field of view | 1.28° × 0.72° | 2.45° × 1.38° |
| Sub exposures | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (LP filter) | Built in (LP filter) |
| “No filter” position | UV/IR-cut | UV/IR-cut |
| Read noise used | 1 e⁻ | 1 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | Seestar S50 | Seestar S50 Pro | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 27 min525 subs | 1 h 36 min575 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 12 min75 subs | 14 min83 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 25 min512 subs | 1 h 36 min574 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 4 h 37 min1,661 subs | 5 h 03 min1,817 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 7 min42 subs | 8 min46 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 33 min557 subs | 1 h 44 min625 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 7 min44 subs | 8 min48 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 42 min971 subs | 2 h 57 min1,063 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | Seestar S50 | Seestar S50 Pro | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 34 min204 subs | 38 min227 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 10 min58 subs | 11 min65 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 59 min357 subs | 1 h 08 min407 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 40 min602 subs | 1 h 52 min672 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 6 min36 subs | 7 min40 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 04 min387 subs | 1 h 13 min441 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 5 min30 subs | 5 min30 subs | Same |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h362 subs | 1 h 07 min404 subs | Seestar S50 1.1× |
Try the Seestar S50 in the calculator Try the Seestar S50 Pro
About the ZWO Seestar S50
The scope that made smart astrophotography mainstream. 50 mm triplet, 2 MP sensor, dual-band filter on a wheel. Alt-Az stacking at 10 s, EQ mode unlocks 60 s. Out of production since 2026 and replaced by the S50 Pro, but there are a great many in use.
About the ZWO Seestar S50 Pro
The S50 optics at 260 mm on an 8 MP 1/1.2-inch sensor: a wider, taller field, four times the pixels, and 60 s subs in EQ mode. Per pixel it is a whisker slower than the S50 because of the longer focal length; the long subs make it the better dark-site scope.
Other comparisons
Seestar S50
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S30 Pro
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 vs Draco
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 vs Vespera II
- Seestar S50 vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Vespera 3
- Seestar S50 vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 vs Odyssey
- Seestar S50 vs Origin
- Seestar S50 vs Origin Mark II
Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Draco
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Odyssey
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · Seestar S50 page · Seestar S50 Pro page