Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
ZWO Seestar S50 Pro against Unistellar eQuinox 2, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, they are about the same speed. From a rural Bortle 3 sky they are about the same speed.
Field of view. The Seestar S50 Pro shows 2.45° × 1.38° against 0.76° × 0.57°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the eQuinox 2 needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. The eQuinox 2 samples at 1.33″ per pixel against 2.30″, so it pulls finer structure from small targets: planetary nebulae, globular cores, galaxy arms.
Subs and dark skies. The Seestar S50 Pro goes up to 60 s subs in EQ mode, the eQuinox 2 tops out at 4 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The Seestar S50 Pro has a dual-band filter built in; the eQuinox 2 does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Seestar S50 Pro | eQuinox 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 50 mm | 114 mm |
| Focal length | 260 mm (f/5.2) | 450 mm (f/3.9) |
| Sensor | OmniVision OS08B10 (1/1.2″), 8.3 MP | IMX347-class, 2.9 µm (Unistellar does not name it), 3.2 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 2.9 µm |
| Pixel scale | 2.30″/px | 1.33″/px |
| Field of view | 2.45° × 1.38° | 0.76° × 0.57° |
| Sub exposures | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s | 4 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (LP filter) | None |
| “No filter” position | UV/IR-cut | No filter |
| Read noise used | 1 e⁻ | 1.8 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | eQuinox 2 | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 36 min575 subs | 1 h 19 min1,191 subs | eQuinox 2 1.2× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 14 min83 subs | 15 min224 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.1× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 36 min574 subs | 2 h 04 min1,854 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.3× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 5 h 03 min1,817 subs | 4 h 14 min3,814 subs | eQuinox 2 1.2× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min46 subs | 6 min96 subs | eQuinox 2 1.2× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 44 min625 subs | 2 h 15 min2,028 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.3× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min48 subs | 6 min94 subs | eQuinox 2 1.3× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 57 min1,063 subs | 2 h 28 min2,219 subs | eQuinox 2 1.2× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | eQuinox 2 | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 38 min227 subs | 46 min690 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.2× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 11 min65 subs | 9 min137 subs | eQuinox 2 1.2× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 08 min407 subs | 1 h 11 min1,064 subs | Same |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 52 min672 subs | 2 h 24 min2,164 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.3× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 7 min40 subs | 4 min66 subs | eQuinox 2 1.5× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 13 min441 subs | 1 h 17 min1,162 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.1× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 5 min30 subs | 4 min60 subs | eQuinox 2 1.3× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h 07 min404 subs | 1 h 25 min1,270 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.3× |
Try the Seestar S50 Pro in the calculator Try the eQuinox 2
About the ZWO Seestar S50 Pro
The S50 optics at 260 mm on an 8 MP 1/1.2-inch sensor: a wider, taller field, four times the pixels, and 60 s subs in EQ mode. Per pixel it is a whisker slower than the S50 because of the longer focal length; the long subs make it the better dark-site scope.
About the Unistellar eQuinox 2
A 114 mm Newtonian with five times the light grasp of a 50 mm refractor. Fixed 4 s subs put it in read-noise territory under dark skies, but the aperture carries it. The published field is 45.6′ × 34.2′, a crop of the sensor.
Other comparisons
Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Draco
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Odyssey
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin Mark II
eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S30 vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S30 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF 3 vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF mini vs eQuinox 2
- Draco vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF II vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera II vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera 3 vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera Pro 2 vs eQuinox 2
- eQuinox 2 vs Odyssey
- eQuinox 2 vs Origin
- eQuinox 2 vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · Seestar S50 Pro page · eQuinox 2 page