Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
ZWO Seestar S50 Pro against DwarfLab DWARF II, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the Seestar S50 Pro is 4× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the Seestar S50 Pro is 3× faster.
Field of view. The DWARF II shows 3.19° × 1.79° against 2.45° × 1.38°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the Seestar S50 Pro needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. The Seestar S50 Pro samples at 2.30″ per pixel against 2.99″, so it pulls finer structure from small targets: planetary nebulae, globular cores, galaxy arms.
Subs and dark skies. The Seestar S50 Pro goes up to 60 s subs in EQ mode, the DWARF II tops out at 15 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The Seestar S50 Pro has a dual-band filter built in; the DWARF II does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Seestar S50 Pro | DWARF II |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 50 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal length | 260 mm (f/5.2) | 100 mm (f/4.2) |
| Sensor | OmniVision OS08B10 (1/1.2″), 8.3 MP | Sony IMX415, 8.3 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 1.45 µm |
| Pixel scale | 2.30″/px | 2.99″/px |
| Field of view | 2.45° × 1.38° | 3.19° × 1.79° |
| Sub exposures | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s | 15 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (LP filter) | None |
| “No filter” position | UV/IR-cut | Astro |
| Read noise used | 1 e⁻ | 1.2 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | DWARF II | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 36 min575 subs | 4 h 59 min1,198 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 14 min83 subs | 57 min228 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 4× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 36 min574 subs | 7 h 45 min1,860 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 5× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 5 h 03 min1,817 subs | 16 h3,817 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min46 subs | 25 min101 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 44 min625 subs | 8 h 29 min2,035 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 5× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min48 subs | 24 min97 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 57 min1,063 subs | 9 h 16 min2,225 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | DWARF II | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 38 min227 subs | 2 h 31 min603 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 4× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 11 min65 subs | 31 min126 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.9× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 08 min407 subs | 3 h 50 min922 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 52 min672 subs | 7 h 44 min1,856 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 4× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 7 min40 subs | 16 min64 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.4× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 13 min441 subs | 4 h 11 min1,006 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 5 min30 subs | 14 min57 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.8× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h 07 min404 subs | 4 h 34 min1,097 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 4× |
Try the Seestar S50 Pro in the calculator Try the DWARF II
About the ZWO Seestar S50 Pro
The S50 optics at 260 mm on an 8 MP 1/1.2-inch sensor: a wider, taller field, four times the pixels, and 60 s subs in EQ mode. Per pixel it is a whisker slower than the S50 because of the longer focal length; the long subs make it the better dark-site scope.
About the DwarfLab DWARF II
The original pocket scope. 24 mm aperture and tiny 1.45 µm pixels mean it is slow per pixel, so bin or downsample and be patient.
Other comparisons
Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Draco
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Odyssey
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin Mark II
DWARF II
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF II
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF II
- DWARF mini vs DWARF II
- Draco vs DWARF II
- DWARF II vs Vespera II
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF II vs Vespera 3
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF II vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF II vs Odyssey
- DWARF II vs Origin
- DWARF II vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · Seestar S50 Pro page · DWARF II page