Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
ZWO Seestar S50 Pro against Vaonis Vespera Pro, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the Seestar S50 Pro is 2.5× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the Seestar S50 Pro is 1.9× faster.
Field of view. The Seestar S50 Pro shows 2.45° × 1.38° against 1.62° × 1.62°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the Vespera Pro needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. The Vespera Pro samples at 1.65″ per pixel against 2.30″, so it pulls finer structure from small targets: planetary nebulae, globular cores, galaxy arms.
Subs and dark skies. The Seestar S50 Pro goes up to 60 s subs in EQ mode, the Vespera Pro tops out at 30 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The Seestar S50 Pro has a dual-band filter built in; the Vespera Pro does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Seestar S50 Pro | Vespera Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal length | 260 mm (f/5.2) | 250 mm (f/5.0) |
| Sensor | OmniVision OS08B10 (1/1.2″), 8.3 MP | Sony IMX676, 12.5 MP |
| Pixel size | 2.9 µm | 2 µm |
| Pixel scale | 2.30″/px | 1.65″/px |
| Field of view | 2.45° × 1.38° | 1.62° × 1.62° |
| Sub exposures | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s | 10 s, 20 s, 30 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (LP filter) | Clip-on option (Dual Band filter) |
| “No filter” position | UV/IR-cut | No filter |
| Read noise used | 1 e⁻ | 0.8 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | Vespera Pro | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 36 min575 subs | 3 h 16 min1,176 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.0× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 14 min83 subs | 38 min227 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.7× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 36 min574 subs | 5 h 04 min1,822 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 5 h 03 min1,817 subs | 10 h3,727 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.1× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min46 subs | 17 min103 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.3× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 44 min625 subs | 5 h 32 min1,992 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 3× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min48 subs | 16 min98 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.0× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 2 h 57 min1,063 subs | 6 h 03 min2,177 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.0× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | Seestar S50 Pro | Vespera Pro | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 38 min227 subs | 1 h 23 min500 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.2× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 11 min65 subs | 18 min111 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.7× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 08 min407 subs | 2 h 06 min757 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.9× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 1 h 52 min672 subs | 4 h 10 min1,501 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.2× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 7 min40 subs | 10 min62 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.6× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 13 min441 subs | 2 h 17 min824 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.9× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 5 min30 subs | 9 min53 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 1.7× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h 07 min404 subs | 2 h 29 min897 subs | Seestar S50 Pro 2.2× |
Try the Seestar S50 Pro in the calculator Try the Vespera Pro
About the ZWO Seestar S50 Pro
The S50 optics at 260 mm on an 8 MP 1/1.2-inch sensor: a wider, taller field, four times the pixels, and 60 s subs in EQ mode. Per pixel it is a whisker slower than the S50 because of the longer focal length; the long subs make it the better dark-site scope.
About the Vaonis Vespera Pro
The square-sensor Vespera with 2 µm pixels. Higher resolution than the II, and correspondingly slower per pixel: expect around double the time for the same per-pixel SNR. Run-out in 2026 and replaced by the Vespera Pro 2.
Other comparisons
Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Seestar S50 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Seestar S30 Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF mini
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Draco
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Odyssey
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Origin Mark II
Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S50 Pro vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S30 vs Vespera Pro
- Seestar S30 Pro vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF 3 vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF mini vs Vespera Pro
- Draco vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro
- Vespera II vs Vespera Pro
- Vespera Pro vs Vespera 3
- Vespera Pro vs Vespera Pro 2
- Vespera Pro vs eQuinox 2
- Vespera Pro vs Odyssey
- Vespera Pro vs Origin
- Vespera Pro vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · Seestar S50 Pro page · Vespera Pro page