DWARF 3 vs DWARF II: which is faster for deep-sky imaging?
DwarfLab DWARF 3 against DwarfLab DWARF II, on the same targets from the same skies, using the same photon-budget model as the rest of the site. Times are for a solid image; the calculator gives quick-look and showpiece figures too.
Speed. Across the 30 most popular targets from a suburban Bortle 6 sky, the DWARF 3 is 3× faster (geometric mean of the solid-image times, each scope on its recommended filter and default subs). From a rural Bortle 3 sky the DWARF 3 is 3× faster.
Field of view. The DWARF II shows 3.19° × 1.79° against 2.93° × 1.65°, so big targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy, the North America Nebula and the Pleiades fit with room to spare where the DWARF 3 needs a mosaic or a tight crop.
Detail. Pixel scales are within 10% of each other, so neither has a real detail advantage.
Subs and dark skies. The DWARF 3 goes up to 60 s subs in EQ mode, the DWARF II tops out at 15 s. That matters little from a city, where skyglow sets the floor, and a lot from a dark site, where read noise does.
Filters. The DWARF 3 has a dual-band filter built in; the DWARF II does not, which costs it heavily on emission nebulae from any suburban sky.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | DWARF 3 | DWARF II |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 35 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal length | 150 mm (f/4.3) | 100 mm (f/4.2) |
| Sensor | Sony IMX678, 8.3 MP | Sony IMX415, 8.3 MP |
| Pixel size | 2 µm | 1.45 µm |
| Pixel scale | 2.75″/px | 2.99″/px |
| Field of view | 2.93° × 1.65° | 3.19° × 1.79° |
| Sub exposures | 15 s, 30 s, 60 s | 15 s |
| Dual-band filter | Built in (Dual-band) | None |
| “No filter” position | Astro | Astro |
| Read noise used | 0.6 e⁻ | 1.2 e⁻ |
Timed on the same targets
Suburban sky (Bortle 6)
| Target | DWARF 3 | DWARF II | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 2 h 07 min509 subs | 4 h 59 min1,198 subs | DWARF 3 2.4× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 16 min66 subs | 57 min228 subs | DWARF 3 3× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 46 min424 subs | 7 h 45 min1,860 subs | DWARF 3 4× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 6 h 41 min1,604 subs | 16 h3,817 subs | DWARF 3 2.4× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 10 min39 subs | 25 min101 subs | DWARF 3 2.6× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 55 min460 subs | 8 h 29 min2,035 subs | DWARF 3 4× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 11 min44 subs | 24 min97 subs | DWARF 3 2.2× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 3 h 55 min939 subs | 9 h 16 min2,225 subs | DWARF 3 2.4× |
Rural sky (Bortle 3)
| Target | DWARF 3 | DWARF II | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andromeda GalaxyGalaxy | 44 min178 subs | 2 h 31 min603 subs | DWARF 3 3× |
| Orion NebulaEmission nebula | 12 min48 subs | 31 min126 subs | DWARF 3 2.6× |
| North America NebulaEmission nebula | 1 h 06 min264 subs | 3 h 50 min922 subs | DWARF 3 3× |
| Pinwheel GalaxyGalaxy | 2 h 08 min514 subs | 7 h 44 min1,856 subs | DWARF 3 4× |
| Ring NebulaPlanetary nebula | 8 min33 subs | 16 min64 subs | DWARF 3 2.0× |
| Western Veil NebulaSupernova remnant | 1 h 11 min285 subs | 4 h 11 min1,006 subs | DWARF 3 4× |
| Hercules ClusterGlobular cluster | 8 min30 subs | 14 min57 subs | DWARF 3 1.9× |
| PleiadesReflection nebula | 1 h 18 min312 subs | 4 h 34 min1,097 subs | DWARF 3 4× |
Try the DWARF 3 in the calculator Try the DWARF II
About the DwarfLab DWARF 3
Small pixels on a 35 mm f/4.3 lens give a sharper image than its aperture suggests, and EQ mode with 60 s subs makes it the read-noise winner in dark skies.
About the DwarfLab DWARF II
The original pocket scope. 24 mm aperture and tiny 1.45 µm pixels mean it is slow per pixel, so bin or downsample and be patient.
Other comparisons
DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF 3
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF 3
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF mini
- DWARF 3 vs Draco
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF II
- DWARF 3 vs Vespera II
- DWARF 3 vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF 3 vs Vespera 3
- DWARF 3 vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF 3 vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF 3 vs Odyssey
- DWARF 3 vs Origin
- DWARF 3 vs Origin Mark II
DWARF II
- Seestar S50 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S50 Pro vs DWARF II
- Seestar S30 vs DWARF II
- Seestar S30 Pro vs DWARF II
- DWARF 3 vs DWARF II
- DWARF mini vs DWARF II
- Draco vs DWARF II
- DWARF II vs Vespera II
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro
- DWARF II vs Vespera 3
- DWARF II vs Vespera Pro 2
- DWARF II vs eQuinox 2
- DWARF II vs Odyssey
- DWARF II vs Origin
- DWARF II vs Origin Mark II
All comparisons · Buying guide · DWARF 3 page · DWARF II page